ABSTRACT
Introduction: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) is a phase 2, multicohort study evaluating cilta-cel, an anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy, in several multiple myeloma (MM) patient (pt) populations. Objective(s): To report updated results with longer follow-up on cohort C pts with previous exposure to a non-cellular anti- BCMA immunotherapy. Method(s): Cohort C pts had progressive MM after treatment (tx) with a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory drug, anti-CD38 antibody, and non-cellular BCMA-targeting agent. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75x106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was administered 5-7 days post lymphodepletion. Primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and adverse events (AEs). Result(s): As of June 1, 2022, 20 pts (13 ADC exposed;7 BsAb exposed) were treated with cilta-cel;4 pts did not receive cilta-cel due to either low cellular yield (n=2, 1 in each group) or death due to progressive disease (PD) prior to dosing (n=2, 1 in each group) and 6 pts received anti-BCMA tx as their last line of therapy (n=4 ADC, n=2 BsAb). During prior anti-BCMA tx, best responses included VGPR (ADC: 2 pts;BsAb: 1 pt), sCR (ADC: 1 pt), and CR (BsAb: 1 pt);the rest had best response of stable disease or PD (1 pt not evaluable). Baseline characteristics are presented in Figure 1A. Median time from last anti- BCMA agent to cilta-cel infusion was 195 d;median administered dose of cilta-cel was 0.65x106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg. At a median follow-up of 18.0 mo, 7/10 evaluable pts (70%) were MRD negative at 10-5 (ADC: 5/7 [71.4%], BsAb: 2/3 [66.7%]). ORR: full cohort, 60%;ADC, 61.5%;BsAb, 57.1% (Figure 1B). Median DOR: full cohort, 12.8 mo;ADC, 12.8 mo;BsAb, 8.2 mo. Median PFS: full cohort, 9.1 mo;ADC, 9.5 mo;BsAb, 5.3 mo. Cilta-cel responders had a shorter median duration of last anti- BCMA agent exposure (29.5 d) compared with non-responders (63.5 d). Responders also had a longer median time from last anti-BCMA tx exposure to apheresis (161.0 d) than non-responders (56.5 d). Most common AEs were hematologic. CRS: n=12 (60%;all Gr1/2), median time to onset 7.5 d, median duration 6.0 d. ICANS: n=4 (20%, 2 Gr3/4), median time to onset 9.0 d, median duration 7.0 d. No patient had movement or neurocognitive tx emergent AE/parkinsonism. There were 12 deaths (PD: 8;COVID-19 pneumonia: 2 [not tx related];subarachnoid hemorrhage: 1 [not tx related];C. difficile colitis: 1 [tx related]). (Figure Presented)(Figure Presented)Conclusions: Pts with heavily pretreated MM and previous exposure to a non-cellular anti-BCMA therapy had favorable responses to cilta-cel. However, depth and DOR appear lower than that seen in anti-BCMA-naive pts treated with cilta-cel (at 27.7 mo, median DOR was not reached in heavily pre-treated but anti-BCMA naive CARTITUDE-1 pts). These data may inform tx plans, including sequencing and washout period between BCMA-targeting agentsCopyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Context: CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) Cohort A is assessing cilta-cel in lenalidomide-refractory patients with progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT. Objective(s): To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A. Design(s): Phase 2, multicohort study. Patient(s): Lenalidomide-refractory patients with progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT (PI and IMiD included) and no previous exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. Intervention(s): Single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75x106 CAR+ viable T-cells/kg) after lymphodepletion Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were used to reduce risk of movement/neurocognitive adverse events (MNTs). Pharmacokinetics (PK) (Cmax/Tmax of CAR+T-cell transgene levels), cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related cytokines over time, peak cytokine levels by response/CRS, association of cytokine levels with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR+T-cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response/CRS/ICANS are being evaluated. Result(s): As of January 2022 (median follow-up [MFU] 17.1 months), 20 patients (65% male;median age 60 years;median 2 prior LOT;95% refractory to last LOT) received cilta-cel. Overall response rate was 95% (90% >=complete response;95% >=very good partial response). Median times to first and best response were 1.0 month and 2.6 months, respectively. All 16 MRD-evaluable patients achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median duration of response was not reached. At 12 months, event-free rate was 79% and progression-free survival rate was 75%. 95% of patients had CRS (gr3/4 10%);median time to onset was 7 days and median duration was 3 days. Neurotoxicity was reported in 30% of patients (5 gr1/2;1 gr3/4) and ICANS in 15% (all 3 gr1/2);1 patient had gr2 facial paralysis. No MNTs were observed. 1 death occurred due to COVID-19 (treatment-related), 2 due to progressive disease, and 1 due to sepsis (not treatment-related). Preliminary PK analyses showed peak CAR-T cell expansion at day 10.5;median persistence was 153.5 days. Conclusion(s): At MFU of 17.1 months, a single cilta-cel infusion resulted in deep and durable responses in lenalidomide-refractory MM patients with 1-3 prior LOT. We will present updated PK/cytokine/CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlation to provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy/safety in this population. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
ABSTRACT
Background: Cohort A of the multicohort phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study is assessing ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received 1-3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) and were refractory to lenalidomide (len). This population is difficult to treat and has poor prognosis. Aims: To present updated results from CARTITUDE-2 Cohort A. Methods: All patients provided informed consent. Eligible patients had progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT that included a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD). Patients were len-refractory and had no prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. Patients received a single cilta-cel infusion (target dose: 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) after lymphodepletion. Cilta-cel safety and efficacy were assessed. The primary endpoint was minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity at 10-5 by next generation sequencing. Patient management strategies were used to reduce the risk of movement and neurocognitive adverse events (MNTs). Other assessments included pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses (Cmax and Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood), levels of cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related cytokines (e.g., IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: As of January 2022 (median follow-up: 17.1 months [range: 3.3-23.1]), cilta-cel was administered to 20 patients (male: 65%;median age: 60 years [range: 38-75]). Median number of prior LOT was 2 (range: 1-3);median time since MM diagnosis was 3.5 years (range: 0.7-8.0). 95% of patients were refractory to their last LOT;40% were triple-class refractory. Overall response rate was 95%, with 90% of patients achieving ≥complete response and 95% achieving ≥very good partial response. Median time to first response was 1.0 month (range: 0.7-3.3);median time to best response was 2.6 months (range: 0.9-13.6). All MRD-evaluable patients (n=16) achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median duration of response was not reached. The 12-month progression-free survival rate was 75% and the 12-month event-free rate was 79%. CRS occurred in 95% of patients (grade 3/4: 10%), with a median time to onset of 7 days (range: 5-9) and median duration of 3 days (range: 2-12). 30% of patients had neurotoxicity (5 grade 1/2 and 1 grade 3/4). ICANS occurred in 3 patients (15%;all grade 1/2);1 patient had facial paralysis (grade 2). No MNTs were observed. 1 death due to COVID-19 occurred and was assessed as treatment-related by the investigator;2 deaths due to progressive disease and 1 due to sepsis (not related to treatment) also occurred. Based on preliminary PK analyses of CAR transgene by qPCR, peak expansion of CAR-T cells occurred at day 10.5 (range: 8.7-42.9);median persistence was 153.5 days (range: 57.1-336.8). Summary/Conclusion: A single cilta-cel infusion led to deepening and durable responses at this longer follow-up (median 17.1 months) in patients with MM who had 1-3 prior LOT and were len-refractory. Follow-up is ongoing. We will present updated and detailed PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses as well as clinical correlation to provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in this difficult-to-treat patient population, which is being further evaluated in the CARTITUDE-4 study (NCT04181827;enrollment concluded).
ABSTRACT
Background: Cohort A of the multicohort phase 2 CARTITUDE-2 (NCT04133636) study is evaluating cilta-cel safety and efficacy in pts with MM who received 1-3 prior LOT and were len-refractory - a difficult- to-treat population with poor prognosis. We present updated results. Methods: Pts had progressive MM after 1-3 prior LOT, including a PI and IMiD, were len-refractory, and had no prior exposure to BCMA-targeting agents. A single cilta-cel infusion (target dose 0.75×106 CAR+ viable T cells/kg) was given post lymphodepletion. Safety and efficacy were assessed, and the primary endpoint was MRD negativity at 10-5. Management strategies were implemented to minimize risk of movement/neurocognitive AEs (MNTs). Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses (Cmax and Tmax of CAR+ T-cell transgene levels in blood) are being conducted, as well as analyses of levels of CRS-related cytokines (eg, IL-6) over time, peak levels of cytokines by response and CRS, association of cytokine levels with ICANS, and CAR+ T cell CD4/CD8 ratio by response, CRS, and ICANS. Results: As of January 2022 (median follow- up [MFU] 17.1 mo [range 3.3-23.1]), 20 pts (65% male;median age 60 y [range 38-75]) received cilta-cel. Pts received a median of 2 (range 1-3) prior LOT, and a median of 3.5 y (range 0.7-8.0) since MM diagnosis. 95% were refractory to last LOT, and 40% were triple-class refractory. ORR was 95%, 90% achieved CR or better, and 95% had ≥VGPR. Median times to first and best response were 1.0 mo (range 0.7-3.3) and 2.6 mo (range 0.9-13.6), respectively. 16 pts were MRDevaluable, all of whom achieved MRD negativity at 10-5. Median DOR was not reached and 12-mo event-free rate was 79%. The 12-mo PFS rate was 75%. Median time to onset of CRS was 7 d (range 5-9) and occurred in 95% of pts (gr 3/4: 10%), with median duration of 3 d (range 2-12). Neurotoxicity occurred in 30% of pts (5 gr 1/2;1 gr 3/4). 3 pts (15%) had ICANS (all gr 1/2);1 pt had gr 2 facial paralysis. No MNTs were seen. 1 death occurred due to COVID-19 (assessed as tx-related by the investigator), 2 due to progressive disease, and 1 due to sepsis (not related to tx). Preliminary PK analyses indicate that peak expansion of CAR-T cells occurred at d 10.5 (range 8.7-42.9) and median persistence was 153.5 d (range 57.1-336.8). Conclusions: At a longer MFU of 17.1 mo, a single cilta-cel infusion led to deepening and durable responses in pts with MM who had 1-3 prior LOT and were lenrefractory. Follow-up is ongoing. Updated and in-depth PK, cytokine, and CAR-T subset analyses and clinical correlation will be presented and provide novel insights into biological correlates of efficacy and safety in this pt population. This pt population is being further evaluated in the CARTITUDE-4 study (NCT04181827), which has concluded enrollment.
ABSTRACT
Background. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has imposed unprecedented stressors on South Africa (SA)'s healthcare system. Superimposed on the country's quadruple burden of disease, pandemic-related care further exposes existing inequities. Some of these inequities are specific to hospital-based inpatient services, such as the geographical maldistribution of hospital beds, lack of oxygen supplies and assisted ventilation, and scarcity of trained healthcare workers. Certain high-risk groups, such as individuals with cardiometabolic comorbidity, are likely to develop severe COVID-19 disease requiring hospitalisation with potential for a prolonged length of stay (LoS). It may be helpful for health authorities to identify those at risk for prolonged LoS to facilitate appropriate health systems planning. Objectives. To identify hospital admission laboratory parameters associated with a hospital stay >14 days in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods. A retrospective observational study design was used. Laboratory data were obtained from an SA private laboratory for 642 inpatients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 pneumonia, comprising 7 months of admission laboratory data from six private hospitals in Johannesburg, Gauteng Province. Results. Of 642 hospital admissions for pneumonia, 497 were confirmed to have COVID-19 infection (reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test positive). In the COVID-19-positive group, hospital LoS was prolonged in 35.4% of admissions. Univariate analysis demonstrated an association with the following risk factors for prolonged LoS: older age;male sex;high serum creatinine, sodium (Na), chloride, potassium and urea levels and low estimated glomerular filtration rate;raised white blood cell count, lymphopenia, neutrophilia and an elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR);and elevated levels of D-dimers, interleukin-6 (IL-6), and procalcitonin (PCT). The strongest univariate associations (relative risk (RR) ≥2.0) with a hospital stay >14 days were high Na levels, NRL >18, high PCT levels and IL-6 >40 pg/mL. On multivariable analysis, the following factors remained significantly associated with prolonged LoS: older age (RR 1.015 per year of age;95% confidence interval (CI) 1.005 - 1.024);hypernatraemia (RR 1.80;95% CI 1.25 - 2.60);hyperkalaemia (RR 1.61;95% CI 1.18 - 2.20);and neutrophilia (RR 1.47;95% CI 1.15 - 1.88). Conclusions. COVID-19 pandemic preparedness requires hospital-based inpatient care to be prioritised in resource-limited settings, and availability of beds and prompt admissions are essential to ensure good clinical outcomes. In this study of COVID-19 patients admitted with pneumonia, multivariable analysis showed older age, hypernatraemia, hyperkalaemia and neutrophilia to be associated with LoS >14 days. This may assist with healthcare systems planning. © 2022 South African Medical Association. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background/AimsMedical students need to gain patient contact to develop their skills inhistory taking and examinations. In year three, undergraduate studentstypically rotate across various hospitals and specialties and areexpected to have dedicated rheumatology exposure for history andexamination competencies. Rheumatology as an out-patient specialtycan limit opportunities for medical students to have broad exposure torheumatological conditions.MethodsIn January 2018, we designed an annual rheumatology half-dayteaching workshop ('Rheumatology Carousel') using a combination oflecture-based teaching and small group based guided clinical historyand examination stations, aimed at third-year medical students fromthe University of Birmingham. This covered key presentations inrheumatology: axial spondyloarthropathy, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis (connective tissue disease), osteoarthritis, and vasculitis. Each station required a Clinical Teaching Fellow or RheumatologyST trainee, overseen by one consultant facilitator. We designed patientproforma's incorporating consent, demographics, key clinical history, therapy, and examination findings. We produced a written patientguide, and consultants invited appropriate patients to volunteer for theday. We designed a one-hour lecture-based tutorial. A lesson plan andschedule were created outlining faculty requirements;including time, roles, and faculty numbers. We invited five to six patients to eachsession, with a plan of four to five focussed examinations. Wedesigned the carousel to accommodate up to 40 students, split intotwo groups running over a day. Focussed examinations involvedstudents in groups of four, with each student being a lead examiner inat least one station, each station lasting 20 minutes. Best practiceexamination techniques for each condition were assessed andemphasised. Following a debrief, we collected feedback fromstudents, faculty, and patients (online and written feedback), usingLikert scores for teaching content, and quality of the session delivery.ResultsThe carousel ran in February 2018, 19, and 20. The sessions werepositively evaluated by students, faculty, and patients. In total, 93students attended, 89/93 completed feedback. Satisfaction scores(mean;SD;range) were high (1-strongly disagree, 5-strongly agree) forcontent (4.8;0.49, range 3-5) and quality of delivery (4.7;0.54;3-5). Allpatients who participated volunteered to return for future teachingsessions, with several patients attending all three years. Free textfeedback indicated students valued structured exposure to coreconditions and called for more sessions of this nature.ConclusionThis sustainable reproducible intervention ensures students havestructured exposure to important rheumatological conditions. Themethodology allows reproducible sessions that are positively evaluated despite rotating clinical teaching staff. We have made all ourteaching materials, logistical plan, and scheduling tools available asopen access resources under a Creative Commons license for free reuse and adaptation by any healthcare professional, via a web link. Weplan to record an electronic version to distribute post the COVID-19pandemic.
ABSTRACT
Background/AimsThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a number of changes inpractice in the UK, including the reduction in routine day-caseattendances for intravenous rheumatology treatments. Due to redeployment and resultant staff shortages, we required alternatives to daycase attendance. The usual face-to-face education that normallysupports this was not possible.MethodsIn March 2020, we identified patients receiving monthly intravenoustocilizumab on our day-unit and planned a supported transition toweekly subcutaneous self-injection. We designed, planned, storyboarded, video-recorded, and piloted a 15-minute tocilizumab selfinjection interactive video resource, using evidence-based educationalmethodology. This included: an introduction;explanation of thechange and context;a one-minute video of our nurse specialist selfadministering a sample injection;a close-up injection video;locallogistical information and contact details, and a voluntary anonymousweb-based evaluation. The interactive resource was searchable andcontained links to supporting information, including a link tomanufacturer patient education material. The intervention receivedrapid institution and pharmacy approval for distribution. We sent it viaSMS message to our cohort of patients using a commercial partner(HealthComm UK) from 8.4.20, using an established method we haverecently described. Simultaneously, we made it publicly available onour departmental website. We collated feedback and usage metricsover an eight-week period (8.4.20 - 3.6.20).ResultsWe identified 69 patients eligible to switch to self-injection;all weresent the SMS link. Our resource was viewed by 39/69 patients (57%)via the unique SMS link, a total of 97 times (mean 2.5 views/patient).Others watched it on our website, 534 views, by 283 unique visitors(1.9 views/visitor). In total, 24/69 patients (35%) returned a completeevaluation of the video, 16/24 (67%) felt more confident injecting afterwatching the resource. Age ranges in deciles (number) was: 40-49, (5);50-59, (6);60-69, (8);>70, (5). Likert scores for satisfaction with theresource (1=strongly disagree;5=strongly agree) were as follows:video ease and playback (4.1);improved confidence of self-injection(4.0), usefulness of SMS methodology (4.3), usefulness of interactiveresource over video (3.7). A number (9/24, 38%) had never selfinjected any medicine. Most completing the evaluation (18/24, 75%)viewed the resource on mobile phones. Written feedback, wheregiven, was positive in 18/19 (95%) cases, one patient identified theycould not watch the video.ConclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic has increased the use of telerheumatologyresources. We have demonstrated that interactive video resources area rapid, acceptable, and useful method of delivering rheumatologyeducation. This intervention is low cost (£0.01 per SMS) and we usedexisting e-learning technology already licensed to our hospital at noadditional cost to the department, other than staff time. Our findingshave implications for other aspects of rheumatology self-care and wecall for further research in this area.